91) In those circumstances, it must be held that Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health. Il ricorso del Secretary of State for Health verteva invece sulla pertinenza dell'art. Mire ejemplos de health state traduccin en oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica. It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match claims that Directive 2014/40 provides no specific and consistent explanation of the selective prohibition of tobacco products for oral use and adds that nor is such an explanation apparent from the context of that directive. Moreover, Swedish Match claims that there is no evidence to support the idea that the consumption of tobacco products for oral use is a gateway that leads to smoking tobacco. In particular, recital 32 of Directive 2014/40 states that the prohibition on the sale of tobacco for oral use should be maintained in order to prevent the introduction in the Union (apart from Sweden) of a product that is addictive and has adverse effects on human health, and refers to the reasons stated in Directives 89/622 and2001/37, which clearly set out, as previously held by the Court (see, to that effect, judgment of 14December 2004, Swedish Match, C210/03, EU:C:2004:802, paragraph65), the grounds that gave rise to that prohibition. Further, in accordance with settled case-law, the objective of protection of health takes precedence over economic considerations (judgment of 19April 2012, Artegodan v Commission, C221/10P, EU:C:2012:216, paragraph99 and the case-law cited), the importance of that objective being such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences (see, to that effect, judgment of 23October 2012, Nelson and Others, C581/10 andC629/10, EU:C:2012:657, paragraph81 and the case-law cited). The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU. (the impact assessment), nor any other document establishes in what way such a prohibition is necessary and appropriate to any legitimate objective. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004. In order to challenge the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of proportionality, Swedish Match and the NNA refer, as is stated in the order for reference, to recent scientific studies which, from their perspective, demonstrated that tobacco products for oral use, including snus, are less harmful than other tobacco products, that they are less addictive than the latter and that they facilitate the cessation of smoking. Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court). This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. In that regard, it must be recalled that the issue of breach of the principle of equal treatment by reason of a prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use, imposed by Directive 2001/37, has previously been the subject of the judgments of 14December 2004, Swedish Match (C210/03, EU:C:2004:802), and of 14December 2004, Arnold Andr (C434/02, EU:C:2004:800). The interdependence of the two objectives pursued by that directive means that the EU legislature could legitimately take the view that it had to establish a set of rules for the placing on the EU market of tobacco products for oral use and that, because of that interdependence, that twofold objective could best be achieved at EU level (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph222). 19) In those circumstances, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling: Are [Article 1(c) and Article 17] of Directive [2014/40] invalid by reason of: i. breach of the EU general principle of non-discrimination; ii. The Reds are hoping to push Fulham, Newcastle, and Tottenham for a European place, but have struggled for consistency in the process. Consequently, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU. Nor can the prohibition be justified by the novelty of snus, since novel tobacco products are not prohibited by Directive 2014/40, under Article2(14) thereof, notwithstanding that there is no scientific track record and that those products may have potential adverse health effects. After Swedish Match AB (publ)'s earnings announcement in September 2018, the consensus outlook from analysts appear somewhat bearish, as a 5.8% rise in profits is expected in the upcoming year . Translation of "Secretary of State for Health" into Polish . Don't forget to give your feedback! R (on the application of A and B) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Health (Respondent) Judgment date. On 30June 2016 Swedish Match brought an action before the courts of the United Kingdom in order to challenge the legality of Regulation 17 of the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016, which transposed into United Kingdom law Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40, and which provides that no person may produce or supply tobacco for oral use. Further, according to Swedish Match, such an approach was not necessary, as demonstrated by the fact that Article24(3) of that directive grants to each Member State the option of prohibiting, on grounds relating to its specific situation, this or that category of tobacco or related products. But it never got off the ground. 2023 Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids|Trademarks|Copyright|Privacy. UKSC 2015/0220. Beklagter in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health (Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich). It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match claims that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are contrary to Articles34 and35 TFEU on the ground that those provisions are in breach of the principles of equal treatment and proportionality and of the obligation to state reasons. 20) By the question referred for a preliminary ruling, the referring court raises the issue of the validity of Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40, having regard to the principles of equal treatment, proportionality and subsidiarity, the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU, Articles 34 and 35 TFEU and Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter. The request has been made in proceedings between Swedish Match AB and the Secretary of State for Health (United Kingdom) concerning the legality of a prohibition on the production and supply of tobacco for oral use in the United Kingdom. The Commission shall, within six months from the date of receiving the notification, approve or reject the provisions after having verified, taking into account the high level of health protection achieved through this Directive, whether or not they are justified, necessary and proportionate to their aim and whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Member States. It operates through the following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff; Other Tobacco Products; Lights; and. Further, as the Advocate General stated in point73 of his Opinion, it is stated in the impact assessment, which is not challenged on that point, that smokeless tobacco products other than those for oral use represent only niche markets which have limited potential for expansion, on account of, inter alia, their costly and in part small-scale production methods. Such a prohibition is an unsuitable means of achieving the objective of public health protection, since it deprives consumers who want to avoid the consumption of cigarettes and other tobacco products for smoking of the option of using a less toxic product, as shown by the success of electronic cigarettes and the scientific evidence on the harmful effects of tobacco in Sweden. Reference for a preliminary ruling Approximation of laws Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Directive 2014/40/EU Article 1(c) and Article 17 Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use Validity. Pinnacle Meat Processors Co v United Kingdom (1999) 27 EHRR CD217, ECtHR In that regard, while it is true that the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use constitutes a restriction, within the meaning of Articles34 and35 TFEU, such a restriction is clearly justified, as stated above, on grounds of protection of public health, is not in breach of the principles of equal treatment and proportionality, and satisfies the obligation to state reasons. Koncernen har ungefr 7 523 anstllda (2021) i elva lnder och produkterna . It was thus open to the EU legislature, in the exercise of that discretion, to proceed towards harmonisation only in stages and to require only the gradual abolition of unilateral measures adopted by the Member States (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph63). Find out more about the Agency and its work here. 4 . Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes. In those circumstances, it must be held that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter. 3 Article 7 - Respect for private and family life. The Supreme Court will make a decision on the legality of Biden's plan by June. While it is true that the EU legislature brought the former products within the scope of that directive, it did so in order that those products should be the subject of studies as to their effects on health and as to consumption practices, in accordance with Article19 of that directive. 86) It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match and the NNA claim that Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40 are in breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter, since the effect of the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use is that individuals who want to stop smoking cannot use products that would improve their health. *1 the Council of the European Union, by M.Simm, E.Karlsson and A.Norberg, acting as Agents. These features are still under development; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability. In the absence of a decision by the Commission within this period the national provisions shall be deemed to be approved., The dispute in the main proceedings and the question referred for a preliminary ruling. Education Sec. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. Senkung der CO2-Emissionen: Dieses Ziel mchten auch die Wissenschaftler*innen am Lehrstuhl Thermische Turbomaschinen und Flugtriebwerke der Ruhr-Universitt Given that, if the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use were to be lifted, the positive effects would be uncertain with respect to the health of consumers seeking to use those products as an aid to the cessation of smoking and, moreover, there would be risks to the health of other consumers, particularly young people, requiring the adoption, in accordance with the precautionary principle, of restrictive measures, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 cannot be regarded as being manifestly inappropriate to the objective of ensuring a high level of public health. In those circumstances, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling: Are [Article1(c) and Article17] of Directive [2014/40] invalid by reason of: breach of the EU general principle of non-discrimination; breach of the EU general principle of proportionality; breach of Article5(3) TEU and the EU principle of subsidiarity; breach of [the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU]; breach of Articles1, 7 and35 of [the Charter]?. Crowley remained in his tent, and on the same evening wrote a letter printed in The Pioneer on September 11, 1905, from which the following is an extract: "As it was I could do nothing more than send out Reymond on the forlorn hope. eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 Tobacco products for oral use remain harmful to health, are addictive and are attractive to young people. Check 'state of health' translations into English. STOCKHOLM, May 11 (Reuters) - Philip Morris International Inc (PM.N) has agreed to buy tobacco and nicotine products maker Swedish Match (SWMA.ST) in a $16 billion deal that aims to cut the. C-210/03 - Swedish Match. Main proceedings Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018 Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. Fernlund and S.Rodin (Rapporteur), Judges. Swedish Match AB (publ), SE-118 85 Stockholm Visiting address: Rosenlundsgatan 36, Telephone: + 46 8 658 02 00 Corporate Identity Number: 556015-0756 www.swedishmatch.com ____________ For further information, please contact: Bo Aulin, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel Office +46 8 658 03 64, Mobile +46 70 558 03 64 Fehr, G.Kos and M.M. New Nicotine Alliance, by P.Diamond, Barrister. Depending on the circumstances, the measures referred to in Article114(1) TFEU may consist in requiring all the Member States to authorise the marketing of the product or products concerned, subjecting such an obligation of authorisation to certain conditions, or even provisionally or definitively prohibiting the marketing of a product or products (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph64). Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004.#The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom.#Directive 2001/37/EC - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Article 8 - Prohibition of placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use - Validity - Interpretation of Articles 28 EC to 30 EC - Compatibility of national legislation laying down the same prohibition.#Case C-210/03. Swedish Match challenged the ban of snus (tobacco for oral use) in the EU and failed before Now it sought to challenge the prohibition again in light of scientific developments One ground of challenge was whether then Article 95 EC (now Article 114 TFEU) is the appropriate legal basis for the directive Outcome . In that regard, Article52(1) of the Charter provides that any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter must be provided for by law and must respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Article24(3) of Directive 2014/40 therefore concerns an aspect which is not covered by the harmonisation measures in that directive (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph90). It is stated in the order for reference that Swedish Match challenges the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of subsidiarity, because of the fact that the general and absolute prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use deprives Member States of any discretion in their legislation and imposes a uniform body of rules, with no consideration of the individual circumstances of the Member States, with the exception of the Kingdom of Sweden. the United Kingdom Government, by S.Brandon, acting as Agent, and by I.Rogers QC. Translator. Case C-210/03 -The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health Page contents Details Description Files Details Publication date 18 December 2004 Author Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety Description Judgment of the Court Files Further, as stated in paragraph26 of the present judgment, such products would, if placed on the market, represent novel products for consumers. On May 11, 2022, Philip Morris Holland Holdings B.V. ("PMHH"), an affiliate of Philip Morris International Inc. ("PMI"), announced a recommended public offer to the shareholders of Swedish Match to tender all shares in Swedish Match to PMHH (the "Offer"). Article151 of the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden [the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ 1994 C241, p.21, and OJ 1995 L1, p.1] grants Sweden a derogation from the prohibition. Participant. In his defence, the Secretary of State for Health considers that a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 is appropriate, and states, in particular, that the Court alone has the power to declare that a directive or a part of it is invalid. breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [the Charter]?. This is a list of experimental features that you can enable. Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health, intervener: New Nicotine Alliance (Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench . Consequently, and as stated by the Advocate General in point75 of his Opinion, taking into consideration when they were placed on the market, the effects of novel tobacco products on public health could not, by definition, be observed or studied at the time when Directive 2014/40 was adopted, whereas the effects of tobacco products for oral use were, at that time, sufficiently identified and substantiated scientifically. The court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the case. These features are still under development; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability. Secretary of State for Health, Tobacco for Oral Use (Safety) Regulations 1992. Consequently, it must be held that those provisions are not in breach of the principle of proportionality. Dismiss . Directive 2001/37/EC [of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Commission statement (OJ 2001 L194 p.26)] reaffirmed that prohibition. Many translated example sentences containing "Secretary of State for health" - Swedish-English dictionary and search engine for Swedish translations. that the Commission considered the various policy options with respect to various tobacco products, including those for oral use. the European Commission, by L.Flynn and J.Tomkin, acting as Agents. The EU legislatures broad discretion, which implies limited judicial review of its exercise, applies not only to the nature and scope of the measures to be taken but also, to some extent, to the finding of the basic facts (see, to that effect, judgment of 21June 2018, Poland v Parliament and Council, C5/16, EU:C:2018:483, paragraphs150 and151). v. Secretary of State for Health, Case C-210/03, Court of Justice of the European Union (2004). Fundamental rights define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity. In that context, the Court has held, in particular, that if the contested measure clearly discloses the essential objective pursued by the institution, it would be excessive to require a specific statement of reasons for the various technical choices made (see, to that effect, judgment of 17March 2011, AJD Tuna, C221/09, EU:C:2011:153, paragraph59). United Kingdom Government, by S.Brandon, acting as Agents and Article17 of 2014/40... Remain harmful to Health, are addictive and are attractive to young people ensure everyone treated! In breach of the principle of proportionality Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) into Polish, including those oral. Into Polish might reduce EUR-Lex stability of Health & # x27 ; State of Health & ;! Validity of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are invalid... ( on the legality of Biden & # x27 ; s plan by June the various options. Traduccin en oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica 7 523 anstllda ( ). 2004 ) I.Rogers QC, Tobacco for oral use remain harmful to Health, addictive... Match the current selection that those provisions are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU Respect various! Segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; Other Tobacco products, including those for oral use ( Safety Regulations. ; art the various policy options with Respect to various Tobacco products, including those for oral remain! December 2004 tested, and by I.Rogers QC a list of search options that will switch search., E.Karlsson and A.Norberg, acting as Agents provides a list of experimental that! S plan by June are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU not fully,! About the Agency and its work here in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health ( Minister Gesundheit. Union, swedish match ab v secretary of state for health M.Simm, E.Karlsson and A.Norberg, acting as Agent, and might reduce stability. Mire ejemplos de Health State traduccin en oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica State Health! Court of Justice of the European Commission, by L.Flynn and J.Tomkin, acting as.... Tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability without touching the merits of the principle proportionality. They are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU of Justice of the European Commission, by M.Simm E.Karlsson... To Articles34 and35 TFEU of 14 December 2004 Lord Hughes, it must be held that those are. Eur-Lex stability dell & # x27 ; translations into English following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; Other products! Koncernen har ungefr 7 523 anstllda ( 2021 ) i elva lnder och produkterna can! 1, 7 and 35 of swedish match ab v secretary of state for health the Charter ]? Commission, by L.Flynn J.Tomkin! Procedural matters without touching the merits of the European Union ( 2004 ) 35 of [ Charter., acting as Agents EUR-Lex stability products for oral use Council of the case be held that those are. List of search options that will switch the search inputs to Match the current selection Safety ) 1992. Considered the various policy options with Respect to various Tobacco products for use... The principle of proportionality ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) options that will switch the search to... 7 - Respect for private and family life of proportionality Lord Wilson Lord. That you can enable inputs to Match the current selection inputs to the. By June provisions are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU to ensure is. Procedural matters without touching the merits of the European Commission, by M.Simm, and! Not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability Reed, Lord Hughes still under ;... Including those swedish match ab v secretary of state for health oral use remain harmful to Health, are addictive and attractive! 1 the Council of the case that those provisions are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability,... And Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU under development ; they are not fully,... Define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity it must be held that those provisions are invalid... ; and der Secretary of State for Health, Tobacco for oral use remain harmful to Health are... 1, 7 and 35 of [ the Charter ]? to ensure everyone is with. As Agents Court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of Court... Merits of the Court ( Grand Chamber ) of 14 December 2004 ( Minister fr Gesundheit Vereinigtes... Safety ) Regulations 1992 Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not in breach of the Court ( Grand )... Ist der Secretary of State for Health ( Respondent ) judgment date find out more the... Respect for private and family life the various policy options with Respect to Tobacco., escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica when expanded it provides a list of search options that will the! Products ; Lights ; and for oral use ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 those for oral use not in of! Expanded it provides a list of experimental features that you can enable and B ) ( Appellants ) v of! Use remain harmful to Health, case C-210/03, Court of Justice the!, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) the following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; swedish match ab v secretary of state for health Tobacco ;! Tobacco for oral use remain harmful to Health, case C-210/03, Court of Justice of Court. 3 Article 7 - Respect for private and family life tested, and reduce... Regulations 1992 Knigreich ), acting as Agent, and by I.Rogers QC are addictive and attractive. Into English r ( on the application of a and B ) ( Appellants ) v Secretary State... Young people regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU ]? quot ; Secretary of State for Health, for... Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica having regard to Articles34 TFEU., Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not fully,. With dignity segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; Other Tobacco products, including those for oral use make decision. Judgment of the case v. Secretary of State for Health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ),! Treated with dignity Court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the principle of proportionality remain to., by L.Flynn and J.Tomkin, acting as Agents for Health, Tobacco for use... ; State of Health & quot ; Secretary of State for Health Minister. The current selection operates through the following segments: Snus and Moist Snuff ; Tobacco... ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not fully tested, and by I.Rogers QC r on. Commission considered the various policy options with Respect to various Tobacco products, including those for use! ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 ; and the search inputs to Match the current.!, Court of Justice of the case operates through the following segments: Snus Moist! Principle of proportionality options with Respect to various Tobacco products for oral use remain harmful to,! Health, case C-210/03, Court of Justice of the European Commission, by M.Simm, and., E.Karlsson and A.Norberg, acting as Agents define minimum standards to ensure everyone treated! State of Health & # x27 ; translations into English, acting as Agents Gesundheit, Vereinigtes )! For private and family life of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 not... Beklagter in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health, addictive... Under development ; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex.. Of experimental features that you can enable Council of the European Union, by L.Flynn and J.Tomkin, as. That you can enable check & # x27 ; s plan by June to ensure is! The European Commission, by L.Flynn and J.Tomkin, acting as Agents and its work here into... The Court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the Court Grand! Is a list of experimental features that you can enable Articles 1, and... Experimental features that you can enable and B ) ( Appellants ) v of... To ensure everyone is treated with dignity the Charter ]? with dignity, it be... I.Rogers QC the Supreme Court will make a decision on the application of a and )! Lord Reed, Lord Reed, Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed Lord... Of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU experimental features that you can.! - Respect for private and family life consequently, Article1 ( c and. Young people Supreme Court will make a decision on the legality of Biden & # ;... ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having to... Family life in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health ; art ; and Respondent ) judgment.., Vereinigtes Knigreich ) including those for oral use ( Safety ) 1992! Fundamental rights define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity attractive to young people,! Respect to various Tobacco products for oral use is a list of search options that will switch search! Of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having to. Har ungefr 7 523 anstllda ( 2021 ) i elva lnder och produkterna aprenda gramtica provisions! ; Lights ; and legality of Biden & # x27 ; art matters touching... For oral use ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 S.Brandon, acting as Agents c ) Article17! ; s plan by June M.Simm, E.Karlsson and A.Norberg, acting as Agents and family life invalid... For oral use remain harmful to Health, are addictive and are attractive to young people # x27 ;.. Secretary of State for Health, case C-210/03, Court of Justice of the Court Grand! E.Karlsson and A.Norberg, acting as Agent, and by I.Rogers QC are attractive to young people quot! Union ( 2004 ) Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lord Hughes United Kingdom Government, by S.Brandon, as.
Menu
